The passive house market in China is not only worth persisting in, but also represents a key direction for the future transformation of the construction industry. Despite facing challenges such as high initial costs and technical barriers, multiple favorable factors, including increased policy support, upgraded market demand, and breakthroughs in technology localization, are driving this field into a stage of large-scale development. The following analysis is conducted from three aspects: core driving forces, practical challenges, and breakthrough paths:
1. Core driving force: resonance of policy, market and technology
1. Policy dividends continue to be released
At the national level, passive houses have been incorporated into the core path of the "dual carbon" strategy, and local policies are being accelerated into implementation. For instance, Hebei Province issued the "Several Policies to Support the Development of the Passive Ultra-Low Energy Consumption Building Industry" in 2023, offering subsidies of up to 5 million yuan for eligible projects and incorporating passive house construction into land transfer conditions. Guangdong Province has set a target of 3 million square meters of ultra-low energy consumption buildings by 2025, with Shenzhen providing funding support for individual demonstration projects up to a maximum of 5 million yuan. As of 2024, 22 new passive house projects have been initiated nationwide, covering a total construction area of 390,000 square meters, exceeding provincial task indicators. Policies have reduced the entry threshold for enterprises from multiple dimensions, including land, funding, and approval, forming a closed loop of "planning-subsidies-certification".
2. Structural upgrading of market demand
Consumers' demands for living quality have shifted from "having a house to live in" to "living in a good house". The characteristics of passive houses, such as constant temperature (20-26℃), constant humidity (30%-70%), and constant oxygen (PM2.5 filtration efficiency > 95%), have become differentiated selling points for high-end residential properties. For example, the Guofeng Shangcheng project in the sub-center of Beijing, as the first large-scale passive house residential project in China, quickly sold out after delivery. Its "prefabricated + passive house" technology achieved a comprehensive energy saving rate of over 90%, reducing carbon emissions by 650 tons annually. In the commercial field, passive house hotels and office buildings have become the preferred choice for corporate ESG investment due to a 30%-50% reduction in energy consumption costs.
3. Breakthrough in technology localization to reduce costs
Domestic enterprises have reduced the cost of passive house construction from 1,500 yuan per square meter in the early stage to around 600 yuan per square meter through material substitution and process innovation. For example, the "On the Water" project in Qinhuangdao uses domestically produced triple-glazed vacuum glass windows (1,000 yuan/square meter) instead of imported products (80,000 yuan/window), and the cost of external wall insulation materials has been reduced from 1,500 yuan/square meter to 700 yuan/square meter. A passive house project in Wuhan has achieved an annual power generation capacity that covers 40% of energy consumption through Building-integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) technology, further diluting the total life cycle cost.
II. Realistic Challenges: Cost, Cognition, and Shortcomings in the Industrial Chain
1. High initial costs hinder market penetration
The construction cost of passive houses is 10%-15% higher than that of traditional buildings. Although they can save more than 50% of energy consumption costs over their entire lifecycle, developers are sensitive to short-term profit margins. For example, the average premium for passive houses in Germany is 15%, while domestic consumers generally accept price increases of less than 10%. In addition, the construction period of passive houses is longer (10%-15% longer than traditional buildings), increasing the pressure on developers' capital turnover.
2. Technical standards and talent gap
Passive houses have stringent requirements for air tightness (with an air change rate of ≤0.6 times per hour) and thermal bridge control, and domestic construction teams generally lack experience in these areas. For example, the Beijing Guofeng Shangcheng project adopted the "film-covering every gap" process to ensure air tightness, sealing all prefabricated component joints, which increased the construction cost by 8%. At the same time, passive house design requires interdisciplinary talents (architecture, HVAC, materials), and currently there are less than 10,000 relevant professionals in China, which restricts the speed of project implementation.
3. Insufficient industry chain synergy
Core components such as high-performance doors and windows, and fresh air systems rely on imports (for example, German Schueco doors and windows account for 70% of the domestic high-end market), while local enterprises have weak research and development capabilities. For instance, the heat transfer coefficient (U-value) of external windows in domestic passive houses generally ranges from 0.8 to 1.0 W/(m²·K), whereas in Germany, it has been reduced to below 0.5 W/(m²·K). Furthermore, the absence of a unified testing and certification system has led to the proliferation of "pseudo-passive houses" in the market, affecting the credibility of the industry.
III. Path to Breaking the Deadlock: Dual-driven by Policy Innovation and Technological Iteration
1. Targeted application of policy tools
- Differentiated subsidies: Provide higher subsidies to affordable housing and green building demonstration projects. For example, Hebei Province rewards passive house projects with a 2%-5% increase in plot ratio.
- Green finance support: Promote "passive house special loans" with interest rates 1-2 percentage points lower than ordinary loans, reducing corporate financing costs.
- Carbon trading mechanism: Integrating the energy savings from passive houses into carbon market transactions is expected to generate a revenue of 50-80 yuan per square meter per year for carbon emission reduction.
2. Technological innovation and industrial synergy
- Material localization: Promote the mass production of new insulation materials such as vacuum insulation panels and aerogels, with the goal of reducing the cost of external wall insulation by another 30%.
- Smart construction: Utilizing BIM technology to optimize thermal bridge design, and achieving integrated construction of complex nodes through 3D printing, thereby reducing the construction period by 15%.
- Cross-sector integration: Exploring the "passive house + photovoltaic + energy storage" model. For example, a project in Shandong achieved 100% self-powered supply through rooftop photovoltaics, with the investment recovery period shortened to 8 years.
3. Market education and brand building
- Promotion of demonstration projects: Build concentrated demonstration areas for passive houses in regions such as the Xiong'an New Area and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, enhancing consumer awareness through on-site experiences.
- Improved certification system: Referring to the German PHI certification standards, a Chinese passive house certification system has been established, granting the "zero carbon residence" label to projects that meet the standards.
- Developer transformation: Encourage leading real estate enterprises such as Vanke and Poly to establish passive housing product lines, reducing costs through large-scale production. For example, Vanke's "zero-carbon community" has been implemented in 12 cities.
IV. Future Outlook: The market size may reach one trillion yuan by 2030
According to industry forecasts, the domestic passive house market is expected to surpass 50 billion yuan in 2025 and reach 1.2 trillion yuan by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate exceeding 30%. Driven by both policy and market forces, passive houses will transition from the high-end market to the mainstream, becoming the core vehicle for the low-carbon transformation of the construction industry. For enterprises, seizing the three key areas of "technological research and development, industrial chain integration, and brand output" will give them an advantage in the new round of green building competition.